For anyone who does 3D graphics, the high-end NVIDIA Quadro cards are the shiniest of red bicycles. At the top-end, they’ve got more memory than most gaming cards, but they've got a price to match their premium features. At $1799 retail, the Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is over $1300 more than the 1GB Geforce GTX 285 and is the only Quadro option available to Mac users. Considering the lack of reviews by 3D professionals who know how to test the card, that’s an expensive leap of faith that a potential customer would have to make. As someone who bought a Quadro FX 5600 for one of my older Mac Pros and Maya, that leap turned out to be quite an expensive letdown. So we thought we’d take another look at the faster Quadro FX 4800 to see if much has changed.
One thing has changed since then: NVIDIA has taken over official support of the Quadro cards and the drivers. Previously, the Quadro was supported by Apple, and while it was obvious NVIDIA had a hand in driver development, it was anyone’s guess as to who was responsible for the lackluster speed. Since the Quadro cards are all about drivers, giving NVIDIA some time to get the Quadro up to speed on the Linux and Windows sides seemed only fair.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
More...
WARNING
![]()
คำเตือน: นี่คือกระทู้เก่าแล้ว
การสนทนานี้เป็นที่เก่ากว่า 90 วัน ข้อมูลที่ปรากฏอยู่ในนั้นอาจไม่เป็นปัจจุบัน
กระทู้อื่นๆล่าสุดในฟอรั่มเดียวกันนี้:
- [ข่าว] Feature: Can AMD survive Bulldozer's disappointing debut? 20/10/2011 09:26:05
- [ข่าว] Larry Ellison unveils Oracle Public Cloud, claims no one will be locked in 08/10/2011 05:00:52
- [ข่าว] Feature: Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its own game 06/09/2011 07:58:49
- [ข่าว] IBM's new transactional memory: make-or-break time for multithreaded revolution 01/09/2011 04:47:07
- [ข่าว] Feature: Speed matters: how Ethernet went from 3Mbps to 100Gbps... and beyond 15/07/2011 10:00:37

































LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


อ้างอิงข้อความ