In accordance with US trade law, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) is required to conduct an annual review of the status of foreign intellectual property laws. This review, which is referred to as Special 301, is typically used to denounce countries that have less restrictive copyright policies than the United States.

The review process is increasingly dominated by content industry lobbyists who want to subvert US trade policy and make it more favorable to their own interests. We have already noted the targeting of Canada for its supposedly lax copyright laws, but that is not the only nation drawing the ire of Big Content. One of the organizations that plays a key role in influencing the Special 301 review is the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), a powerful coalition that includes the RIAA, the MPAA, and the Business Software Alliance (BSA). The IIPA, which recently published its official recommendations to the USTR for the 2010 edition of the 301 review, has managed to achieve a whole new level of absurdity.



Read the comments on this post






More...
WARNING
คำเตือน: นี่คือกระทู้เก่าแล้ว
การสนทนานี้เป็นที่เก่ากว่า 90 วัน ข้อมูลที่ปรากฏอยู่ในนั้นอาจไม่เป็นปัจจุบัน


กระทู้อื่นๆล่าสุดในฟอรั่มเดียวกันนี้: